Review



phyc physiological data  (BIOPAC)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    BIOPAC phyc physiological data
    Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam <t>(PhyC),</t> and the blue line is the <t>electrocardiogram</t> <t>(ECG).</t>
    Phyc Physiological Data, supplied by BIOPAC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/phyc+physiological+data/pmc05702637-228-6-18?v=BIOPAC
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phyc physiological data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications"

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam (PhyC), and the blue line is the electrocardiogram (ECG).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam (PhyC), and the blue line is the electrocardiogram (ECG).

    Techniques Used:

    Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the ECG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG IBIs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the ECG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG IBIs.

    Techniques Used:

    Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the elPPG and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the elPPG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs elPPG IBIs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the elPPG and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the elPPG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs elPPG IBIs.

    Techniques Used:

    Bland–Altman (B–A) contrast parameters for interbeat interval between sensors.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland–Altman (B–A) contrast parameters for interbeat interval between sensors.

    Techniques Used:

    Regression model parameters between sensors when measuring interbeat interval.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Regression model parameters between sensors when measuring interbeat interval.

    Techniques Used:

    Scatter plot for average window interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) color marked by participant. (A) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 2 s average windows IBIs. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 5 s average windows.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Scatter plot for average window interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) color marked by participant. (A) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 2 s average windows IBIs. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 5 s average windows.

    Techniques Used:

    Differences mean and SDs for all subjects, all consditions between the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) for interbeat interval (IBI), IBI 2 s windows, IBI 5 s windows, and HP 30; and R 2 of linear regression for PhyC on ECG.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Differences mean and SDs for all subjects, all consditions between the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) for interbeat interval (IBI), IBI 2 s windows, IBI 5 s windows, and HP 30; and R 2 of linear regression for PhyC on ECG.

    Techniques Used:

    Scatter plots between sensors for heart period (HP), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for heart period (HP), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Techniques Used:

    Scatter plots between sensors for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Techniques Used:

    Scatter plots between sensors for LF, color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for LF, color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Techniques Used:

    Mean of changes from the 1BSL (error bars: ±2 SE) for the three sensors electrocardiogram (ECG), elPPG, and PhysioCam (PhyC). (A) Heart period (HP). (B) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). (C) LF (error bars: ±2 SE).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Mean of changes from the 1BSL (error bars: ±2 SE) for the three sensors electrocardiogram (ECG), elPPG, and PhysioCam (PhyC). (A) Heart period (HP). (B) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). (C) LF (error bars: ±2 SE).

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    phyc physiological data  (BIOPAC)
    90
    BIOPAC phyc physiological data
    Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam <t>(PhyC),</t> and the blue line is the <t>electrocardiogram</t> <t>(ECG).</t>
    Phyc Physiological Data, supplied by BIOPAC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/phyc+physiological+data/pmc05702637-228-6-18?v=BIOPAC
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phyc physiological data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam (PhyC), and the blue line is the electrocardiogram (ECG).

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Physiological signals. Plot of 15 s of data for participant #01 during 1BSL, the green line represents the elPPG, the gray line is the PhysioCam (PhyC), and the blue line is the electrocardiogram (ECG).

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the ECG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG IBIs.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the ECG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG IBIs.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the elPPG and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the elPPG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs elPPG IBIs.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman and scatter plot for interbeat interval (IBI) from the elPPG and PhysioCam (PhyC), color coded by participant. (A) Plot of the IBI differences vs the means for the elPPG and PhyC. Red lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs elPPG IBIs.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Bland–Altman (B–A) contrast parameters for interbeat interval between sensors.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman (B–A) contrast parameters for interbeat interval between sensors.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Regression model parameters between sensors when measuring interbeat interval.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Regression model parameters between sensors when measuring interbeat interval.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Scatter plot for average window interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) color marked by participant. (A) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 2 s average windows IBIs. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 5 s average windows.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter plot for average window interbeat interval (IBI) from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) color marked by participant. (A) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 2 s average windows IBIs. (B) Scatter plot of the PhyC vs ECG for 5 s average windows.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Differences mean and SDs for all subjects, all consditions between the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) for interbeat interval (IBI), IBI 2 s windows, IBI 5 s windows, and HP 30; and R 2 of linear regression for PhyC on ECG.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Differences mean and SDs for all subjects, all consditions between the electrocardiogram (ECG) and PhysioCam (PhyC) for interbeat interval (IBI), IBI 2 s windows, IBI 5 s windows, and HP 30; and R 2 of linear regression for PhyC on ECG.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Scatter plots between sensors for heart period (HP), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for heart period (HP), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Scatter plots between sensors for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Scatter plots between sensors for LF, color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter plots between sensors for LF, color coded by participant. (A) PhysioCam (PhyC) vs electrocardiogram (ECG). (B) PhyC vs elPPG. (C) elPPG vs ECG.

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques:

    Mean of changes from the 1BSL (error bars: ±2 SE) for the three sensors electrocardiogram (ECG), elPPG, and PhysioCam (PhyC). (A) Heart period (HP). (B) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). (C) LF (error bars: ±2 SE).

    Journal: Frontiers in Public Health

    Article Title: The PhysioCam: A Novel Non-Contact Sensor to Measure Heart Rate Variability in Clinical and Field Applications

    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean of changes from the 1BSL (error bars: ±2 SE) for the three sensors electrocardiogram (ECG), elPPG, and PhysioCam (PhyC). (A) Heart period (HP). (B) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). (C) LF (error bars: ±2 SE).

    Article Snippet: ECG, elPPG, and the resampled (1 kHz) PhyC were aligned by use of a synchronization pulse in the Biopac data.

    Techniques: